Latest
True CrimeChrista Pike Returns to Prison After Botched Execution8 hours agoEntertainment“Dr. Stone Terraforming” Sequel Announced With First Trailer8 hours agoGamingWorlds 2026 Team Secret Whales Preview: Teetering on International Success8 hours agoEntertainmentNetflix Sets Nov. 6 Premiere for Under Siege9 hours agoEntertainmentBrad Bird Explains Why Ray Gunn Went to Skydance, Not Pixar9 hours agoEntertainmentTaylor Swift, Travis Kelce Hold Hands on NYC Date Night9 hours agoGamingSonic Racing CrossWorlds Year 2 Adds Final Fantasy VII9 hours agoHealth & RelationshipsBoomer Parent Millennial Daughter Communication Gap9 hours agoGaming NewsJak and Daxter Movie Refuses to Die Quietly9 hours agoEntertainmentMarvel Comic Confirms Ezra Bridger’s Return Before Ahsoka9 hours ago
Entertainment

Paramount merger: 3 powerful pledges fail to win over critics

Paramount merger opponents ask the Supreme Court to intervene despite a settlement covering movie output, cable negotiations and newsroom independence.

Paramount Pictures’ Melrose Gate in Los Angeles, pictured for this Paramount merger report
Paramount Pictures’ Melrose Gate in Los Angeles. Photo: Coolcaesar / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The Paramount merger with Warner Bros. Discovery faces a last-minute challenge from subscribers who want the Supreme Court to stop the transaction. Their Oct. 5 application asks Justice Elena Kagan to intervene while the court considers their case, The Hollywood Reporter reported.

The companies had announced an expected Oct. 6 closing, subject to customary conditions. An application asking the court to intervene does not establish that the justices have ruled on the merger.

Why subscribers oppose the Paramount merger

U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín approved a settlement with 12 states on Sept. 30, The Associated Press reported. The Hollywood Reporter said she also denied the subscribers’ request for a temporary restraining order.

The subscribers contend that combining the businesses would reduce competition in streaming, news and movie distribution. They argue that the settlement leaves those concerns unresolved and that the judge overlooked evidence supporting their request. Those are the plaintiffs’ arguments, rather than findings by the Supreme Court.

Three commitments in the states’ settlement

California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office outlined the enforceable terms when the states reached their agreement. Three provisions address film output, cable negotiations and news operations.

1. A five-year movie schedule

The combined company must release 30 films annually in the first two years and 32 annually in the next three. The agreement also requires at least four independent films each year and additional spending on U.S. production.

2. Separate cable negotiations

For five years, Paramount’s basic cable channels must negotiate separately from Warner Bros.’ channels. The states say that separation is intended to preserve competition over carriage prices.

3. Newsroom oversight

A news editorial independence board is meant to help protect CBS News and CNN. An independent monitor will oversee compliance with the settlement.

The court dispute accompanies a leadership transition. Read our reports on the Paramount-Warner Bros. film team and David Zaslav’s farewell for more on the executives affected.

Total Apex Media Don't stop here Every Score. Every Story. One Home. Breaking sports, entertainment and news from across the Total Apex network, updated all day. Get the Full Story →